DRX9000 reviews: what actually happened on ours
Short answer: instead of asking you to trust a star rating, we published the numbers. We run a DRX9000 in Lancaster, CA, and we reviewed 1,377 of our own patient charts to see what actually happened — the wins, the floor, and the cases it didn’t help. This page is that review. It’s the most useful “review” of a DRX9000 we can honestly give you: the data from ours.
Why we don’t lead with stars
Star ratings tell you how people felt about their visit. They don’t tell you whether the therapy worked, how often, or for whom. A device this expensive deserves a harder question than “how many stars,” so we counted outcomes instead of collecting testimonials — and we publish the strict number, floor and all.
What our 1,377-chart review found
- 62% responded among patients who completed the standard 12-to-24 visit course and started at 4/10 pain or higher (95% CI 58-67%, n=426).
- Average pain in that group fell from 6.7 to 3.5 out of 10.
- 39% finished at 2/10 or less.
- The worst-case floor is 34% — count every patient who ever started a course as a failure (n=975). We publish it beside the 62%.
Under an older, looser measure the same 426 patients give 85% (48% floor). We publish the 62%. The floor keeps the 85% honest.
Finishing the course predicts results
Patients who completed 12-24 visits responded at 62% (n=426); those who stopped at 4-11 visits, 43% (n=102). The most common reason a DRX9000 “review” is disappointing is a course that was never finished.
What it didn’t do — and safety
Central canal stenosis responded at the low end (45%, n=87), and post-fusion spines respond least well (39%, n=18 — small sample): fusion is harder, not hopeless. On safety, 18 of 702 assessed charts (2.6%) flagged a negative outcome, with no documented structural injury caused by the device (a floor, not a complete registry).
We won’t take your case unless we’re confident decompression can help you. Dr. Frye reads your films herself — an MRI is not required.
Book the $47 exam · Call (661) 949-9655
Frequently asked questions
What is the DRX9000 success rate? We publish 62% for course completers (95% CI 58-67%, n=426), with a 34% worst-case floor across everyone who started (n=975). An older, looser measure gives 85%; we publish the stricter number.
Why don’t you show a star rating? Because a star rating doesn’t tell you whether the therapy worked or for whom. We’d rather show you outcomes from our own 1,377 charts.
Why do some people say decompression didn’t work for them? The biggest factor is finishing the course (62% for completers vs 43% for short courses). Structural factors like central canal stenosis or a prior fusion also respond less well.
Related: The DRX9000 · Does spinal decompression work? · Results and methods · Home